[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: opencity NMU to mentors



scripsit Neil Williams:
> On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:19:09 -0700
> Thanasis Kinias <tkinias@kinias.org> wrote:
> 
> > is to do a non-DD NMU and let the Games Team sponsor it if they
> > want...  it seemed silly to duplicate the work.
> > > No URL, no bug reports, no detail - how do you propose that it
> > > gets sponsored?
> 
> Sounds like a request for sponsorship to me - and one that was lacking
> the most basic information.

Well, I expect if I were requesting sponsorship I would have entitled
the e-mail `RFS: ...' and set the seeking-sponsors flag on the mentors
upload to `yes'.  And I would not have specified that it was the
package maintainer I was addressing.

> > (1) I was not addressing you, Neil.
> 
> You were addressing this list and I am part of the list, so I replied.
> Seems straightforward enough. If your mail was for a subset of this
> list, maybe that should have been clearer in the original mail or sent
> direct?

I see now I transposed the `To:' and the `CC:' headers in my original
post:  I was e-mailing the maintainer and CCing this list out of
courtesy since I was using the mentors server to hold the files.  I can
see how it might have been confusing since I in fact did set `To:' to
this list and `CC:' to the maintainer.

> > (2) I was not requesting sponsorship.
> 
> See above. It looked like it to me. YMMV.

Indeed, YMMV.

> > That's twice now, Neil, that you have replied in a very rude and
> > aggressive to my posts to this list. 
> 
> ? Huh ? You misinterpret.
> 
> > I don't know if you are confusing me with someone else or if you
> > just have very poor social skills in general, but since you seem to
> > have an inability to respond politely and constructively I guess I'd
> > just prefer you ignored my posts.  Killfile me if I offend you so.
> > I'm just trying to contribute to this project and I don't need to
> > deal with your attitude problems.
> 
> You appear confused. I have not done anything of the sort and if you
> have misread my requests due to who knows what reason, it is nothing
> to do with me.
> 
> I don't killfile anyone. I'm not impolite although sometimes direct.
> If you see attitude problems where none exist, I can't do much about
> that except continue to contribute in a constructive and efficient
> manner as I have done for some time. Nothing I have said on this list
> or any other public list should be contorted into the meaning you
> appear to ascribe.

Directness is a popular excuse for rudeness.  You go beyond that,
however.

I direct you to reread your response to my RFS for cinepaint, where you
not only were hostile, accused me of lying by omission, and abused me
for using a template on the mentors Web site.

You wrote:
] This just isn't good enough - not by a long way. Packages are not 
] removed from unstable without due cause so be OPEN about the cause - 
] this is open source, this is Debian - "we don't hide problems".

You could, of course, simply have looked at the bug the upload closed,
which would have explained in detail what was going on.  But you didn't
do that; you made a very clear implication that I was hiding the reason
the package was removed and trying to sneak something (harmful?) back
into Debian.

You could have very tersely said something like `You need to give us a
full report of bugs and reason for the package's removal' in your
response, which would have been direct and not unnecessarily padded with
_politesse_.  Instead you chose to characterize my request as `woeful',
accusing me of treating mentors as `a dumping ground for bad packages',
and informed me that I was `going to have to do a LOT more to make up
for such a bad start', since I was `starting from a deeply negative
position', and that my `responses had better be very good'.  Finally,
you were kind enough to sign off by saying you were `not going to do
[my] work for [me] on this one'.

I suppose that might not strike you as hostile or abusive.  As you said,
YMMV.  But I don't think it takes much for this to be `contorted into
the meaning [I] appear to ascribe' (your words), i.e. a `rude and
aggressive' reply (my words).

Incidentally, when I pointed out where you were mistaken about the
presence of RC bugs in the package, you simply failed to respond.
That's fine; I prefer that to further abuse.

-- 
Thanasis Kinias
Doctoral Candidate, Department of History, and
  Instructor, Professional Enhancement Programs
Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, U.S.A.
.
Je ne viens d'aucun pays, d'aucune cité, d'aucune tribu.  Je suis fils de la
route, ma patrie est caravane, et ma vie la plus inattendue des traversées.
  -- Amin Maalouf, _Léon l'Africain_

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: