On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 13:10:25 -0700 Thanasis Kinias <tkinias@kinias.org> wrote: > The package was breaking FHS, Details? Is the breakage RC? > so I rebuilt it for my own system after I > filed a bug. Number? > In doing so I noticed a couple of copyright problems and > filed those bugs too. Numbers? > Rather than mucking with patches or explaining > the issues ? Pardon ? The bug reports have to explain the issue behind the report and for an NMU the bug reports must also include patches. What are the bug report numbers? > I figured the easiest thing to do Easy is not the objective. > is to do a non-DD NMU and > let the Games Team sponsor it if they want... it seemed silly to > duplicate the work. No URL, no bug reports, no detail - how do you propose that it gets sponsored? There is no duplication involved in an NMU - but you must engage with the maintainer, explain your proposals, detail your patches and allow time for the maintainer to either do the upload themselves. From your request, I have no way to tell if you have done any of those essential things. -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
Attachment:
pgpFZR1mTvmgi.pgp
Description: PGP signature