Re: [UPLOADED] hex-a-hop (updated package)
2007/9/11, Jens Seidel <jensseidel@users.sf.net>:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 03:38:06PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> > I uploaded the package. I still have some comments (see below), but
> > they weren't enough reason to not upload.
>
> Thanks.
>
> > On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 12:20:11AM +0200, Jens Seidel wrote:
> > > > this is a "GPL without version" claim, which according to the GPL
> > > > means any version is acceptable. I
> > >
> > > It's still "GPL without version". I need the permission of Miriam and
> > > maybe others before I can change it.
> >
> > Strictly speaking, you don't. You can choose to accept any version, for
> > example "all versions >= 2", like the game itself is licensed. Then you
> > have the right to distribute using that license.
> >
> > However, I agree it is nice to ask people what they intended, and not
> > remove license options without reason.
>
> OK, will probably do this with the next upload.
Go ahead Jens, no problem at all :)
The idea was mainly: "This patch is released under the same license as
the game itself and the packaging", but whatever license or text you
prefer will be OK for me :)
You can change it yourself if you want, but if you prefer to do it
formally nice, just tell me the text you prefer and I'll do the commit
myself :)
The idea is that not only the program itself and the packaging have a
license, but also the patches do have a copyright and license. Maybe
the best text would be "This patch is licensed undet the same license
as the program, see debian/copyright" or something like that.
Greetings,
Miry
Reply to: