Hi Jens, I uploaded the package. I still have some comments (see below), but they weren't enough reason to not upload. On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 12:20:11AM +0200, Jens Seidel wrote: > > this is a "GPL without version" claim, which according to the GPL > > means any version is acceptable. I > > It's still "GPL without version". I need the permission of Miriam and > maybe others before I can change it. Strictly speaking, you don't. You can choose to accept any version, for example "all versions >= 2", like the game itself is licensed. Then you have the right to distribute using that license. However, I agree it is nice to ask people what they intended, and not remove license options without reason. This is a bit of a special case, because "GPL without version" only implicitly means "any version". If that is really intended, it is much better to really write it. > Nevertheless I consider it not as critical. On that I agree. It's not wrong, it just could have been more clear. > > - The manual page mentions the license. This is not required, but if > > you do it, it would be good to point to /usr/share/common-licenses for > > the complete text. > > Not done. This would unfuzzy all translations. This is not necessary and > would be Debian specific. What I meant is that if you consider license information of any value to the reader of the manual page, it should contain a link to the actual license text (it can be on the internet as well). In fact, I expect it not to add much value at all, and I would have removed it completely. But it's up to you, and if you like it better this way, again, it's not wrong. > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 01:15:04AM +0200, Jens Seidel wrote: > > > The package appears to be lintian clean. > > > > You may be using lintian from stable? The one from sid gives the > > errors, anyway. > > I called lintian on the .dsc file instead the .changes file :-) Ok, that's also something you shouldn't do. :-) Perhaps lintian should warn about it... > PS: Sorry Bas, I did not yet fixed your hex-a-hop bug report ... No problem, it's only a wishlist bug. :-) Thanks, Bas -- I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://www.gnupg.org). If you have problems reading my e-mail, use a better reader. Please send the central message of e-mails as plain text in the message body, not as HTML and definitely not as MS Word. Please do not use the MS Word format for attachments either. For more information, see http://pcbcn10.phys.rug.nl/e-mail.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature