[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: ario



Hi

On Sun, 9 Sep 2007 23:10:58 -0400
Justin Pryzby <jpryzby+d@quoininc.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 10:27:08AM +0900, Michal Čihař wrote:
> > Hi
> > 
> > On Sun, 9 Sep 2007 23:35:40 +0200
> > "Marc Pavot" <marc.pavot@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ario".
> > [...]
> > > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
> > 
> > Please fix following issues:
> 
> > - there is no point of including empty README and NEWS as documentation
> But actually debhelper makes an exception and doesn't include empty
> docs in the binary package.  I forget who/when/where this was pointed
> out to me, but the maintainer wanted their source package to DWTW even
> if upstream filled in the originally-empty docs files.

I know they won't end up in resulting package, but I still do not see
reason for listing them as documentation.

> Also you specify -pario to all the debhelper calls, but they all act
> by default on the first binary package anyway.

I also noticed this, but it seems to come from cdbs...

-- 
	Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: