Re: RFS: xpn

To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: RFS: xpn
From: Michael Krauss <mickraus@googlemail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 20:50:38 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20070904205038.2d36dbae@gandalf>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1188853395.6110.8.camel@localhost>
References: <[🔎] 20070903140501.7c35224e@gandalf> <[🔎] 46DBFDBC.4000000@in-medias-res.com> <[🔎] 20070903124451.GB12403@hejre.minidns.net> <[🔎] 20070903125029.GB16493@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <[🔎] 1188833995.8860.25.camel@localhost> <[🔎] 20070903205952.3fd45469@gandalf> <[🔎] 1188853395.6110.8.camel@localhost>

Am Mon, 03 Sep 2007 23:03:15 +0200 schrieb Daniel Leidert:
[...]
> Yes, it says "version", not "Debian revision". The options expects the
> full version, including the upstream version and the Debian revision.
> Say you have
> 
> 1.2.3-0mk1 private
> 1.2.3-1 released to mentors
> 1.2.3-2 released to mentors
> 1.2.3-3 released to Debian
> 
> then use `-v1.2.3-0mk1'.

Thanks for the explanation.


Kind regards,
Michael Krauss

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- RFS: xpn
  - From: Michael Krauss <mickraus@googlemail.com>
- Re: RFS: xpn
  - From: schoenfeld / in-medias-res <schoenfeld@in-medias-res.com>
- Re: RFS: xpn
  - From: "Jan C. Nordholz" <jckn@gmx.net>
- Re: RFS: xpn
  - From: Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>
- Re: RFS: xpn
  - From: Daniel Leidert <daniel.leidert.spam@gmx.net>
- Re: RFS: xpn
  - From: Michael Krauss <mickraus@googlemail.com>
- Re: RFS: xpn
  - From: Daniel Leidert <daniel.leidert.spam@gmx.net>

Prev by Date: Re: RFS: xpn
Next by Date: Re: RFS: xpn
Previous by thread: Re: RFS: xpn
Next by thread: Re: RFS: xpn
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread