Re: debian .orig.tar.gz vs. upstream tar.gz
- To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: debian .orig.tar.gz vs. upstream tar.gz
- From: Jörg Sommer <joerg@alea.gnuu.de>
- Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 15:06:02 +0000 (UTC)
- Message-id: <[🔎] slrnfdo8mq.3d5.joerg@alea.gnuu.de>
- References: <20070822181152.GB4513@caribdis.nul-unu.com> <20070822192553.595da857.codehelp@debian.org> <20070827084851.GA14659@imsc.res.in> <slrnfd5ums.lp4.joerg@alea.gnuu.de> <20070828010539.GA22197@imsc.res.in>
Hi,
Kapil Hari Paranjape <kapil@imsc.res.in> wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Jörg Sommer wrote:
>> > Do *not* get the upstream .tar.gz which may have changed for some
>> > mysterious reason.
>>
>> I don't think the upstream tar.gz have changed, but your orig.tar.gz is
>> not the same as the upstream tar.gz. This happens if the orig.tar.gz was
>> repacked to rename the top directory to <package>-<version>.
>> dpkg-buildpackage -S does this as described by Policy C.4.
>
> Section C.4 describes how to unpack the source without dpkg-source
> not how it is repacked by dpkg-buildpackage
Right, but it's said there that you find a directory
<package>-<version>.orig. A simple program may fail, when it follows
the instructions in section C.4.
Bye, Jörg.
--
Wer in einem gewissen Alter nicht merkt, dass er hauptsächlich von
Idioten umgeben ist, merkt es aus einem gewissen Grunde nicht.
(Curt Goetz)
Reply to: