Re: anyone give me some advice about split scim-bridge
2007/8/10, Brian Nelson <email@example.com>:
> ZhengPeng Hou <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > hi all,
> > I've already splited scim-brodge into scom-brodge-agent
> > scim-brodge-client-gtk, scim-bridge-client-qt, and scim-bridge(a
> > dumy package for upgrade), but now the upstream has added qt4
> > support, so shall I split it into five? likde -agent, -client-gtk
> > -client-qt3, and -client-qt4? is this scheme ok?
> Is there any significant difference between the two to give a reason to
> justify having both? If not, I'd just pick the best supported one and
> just package that.
leeny will have kde4, so I'd include the module for qt4.