On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 01:39:30AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> Why bother with the date? 2.1~svn-r91 seems much more concise and
> has the same information, really.
Though you're right that the information is the same, a date is
meaningful in spite of the knowledge of the revision control system
(subversion in this case). The same can't be said for the SVN revision
number.
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy
zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
(15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ? /\ All one has to do is hit the
(15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema \/ right keys at the right time
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature