Re: RFS: knetstats
Daniel Baumann wrote:
> but now, you've added additional stuff which you have successfully
> removed previously:
> * useless commented docbook-to-man call in rules
> * not required dh_* calls
I don't know which dh_ call you're pointing to. I've not changed any of those
calls. And I don't see any commented dh_ call there.
> i'm wondering if you can't fix one thing and let the rest as it was :))
Still learning. :-)
Ritesh Raj Sarraf
RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com
"Necessity is the mother of invention."
"Stealing logic from one person is plagiarism, stealing from many is research."
"The great are those who achieve the impossible, the petty are those who
cannot - rrs"