Re: man-browser virtual package
On Wednesday 20 September 2006 00:40, Neil Williams wrote:
> Neil Williams wrote:
> Turns out that (answering my own question):
> > Does every package in the virtual man-browser package need to provide
> > the 'man' command or can some require a different command (without a
> > symlink)?
> No - several packages in man-browser don't even accept a file on the
> command line.
Actully even if they all do now, nothing guarantees it will hold true in the
future. Less constraining assumptions, the better ;-)
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu>
fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB