Re: RFS: bastet (updated package)
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:35:13 +0100
James Westby <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
-- snip --
> The debian/copyright is better, but you still need the clarification of
> the license issues. I see you are trying to get this though, thanks.
Upstream didn't answer yet, but, in my opinion, COPYING file shows
clearly that Bastet is licensed under the GPL2, probably upstream will
say the same.
> Apart from this the package looks good to me, and should be ready for
> upload if the license issues are sorted. Unfortuanately I can't upload,
> as I am not a DD.
Thank you for your nice work reviewing my package. I would be glad if
someone uploaded this package for me :-)