Re: RFS: bastet (updated package)
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 20:59:14 +0100
James Westby <email@example.com> wrote:
> I cannot sponsor the package for you as I am not a DD, but I have some
> comments for you.
> * http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch-best-pkging-practices.en.html*/-bpp-upstream-info
> suggests that the Homepage: field be indented by two spaces not one.
404, but i will consider it.
> * The description states that the game is GPL'd, the debian/copyright
> states that it is public domain or MIT. Most of the code has no
> license headers or copyright. At worst it has been relicensed
> against the authors wishes and is undistributable. At best the
> debian/copyright and/or desciption should be updated. In the middle
> is a clarification from upstream, and the addition of the usual
> Copyright statements and license headers.
Description's lines were inherited from last maintainer (i didn't
> * Does the Debian games team that you say you are adopting the package
> for not contain some DDs who will sponsor the packages of the group?
Probably, but obviously there are more potential sponsors here.