Re: RE : RFS: lisaac
[Moving back on list, as I would like to keep it there, and I don't
think the information is private]
On (13/09/06 21:59), PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote:
> * I'm a little wary of the copyright situation, as I can't see any
> statements within the package. It appears the license is DFSG free,
> but you need to include any and all copyright statements in your
> debian/copyright. If there are none you should contact upstream to
> add them.
> Are you sure I added all the Cecillv2 licence text in the debian/copyright.
I realise you did that, however I am not talking about the license, I am
referring to Copyright statements, e.g.
Copyright 2006 James Westby <firstname.lastname@example.org>
They are a separate issue from licenses, as they state who has the
Copyright for the work. Licenses deal with what you as a
user/redistributer/whatever are allowed to do.
> * You need to Build-Depends on dpatch. Do you know about pbuilder to
> try and help you catch things like that?
> I do not know about pbuilder.
Try it out some time (package name pbuilder). It is a very useful tool
that will build your packages in a clean chroot, and can help catch
things like missing Build-Dependencies.
James Westby -- GPG Key ID: B577FE13 -- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256
- RFS: lisaac
- From: PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel <email@example.com>
- Re: RFS: lisaac
- From: James Westby <firstname.lastname@example.org>