On Sat, 2006-07-15 at 21:35 +0100, Michael Stevens wrote: > #debian-mentors suggest this is unacceptably vague. Any suggested > approaches to the upstream author? I've failed to get a response from > him on other matters so far. Contacting him is of course the best way to resolve the issue. I think it works best if you suggest a concrete licence and ask if he agrees that his software be distributed under that licence. In this case, putting it in the public domain seems to match the intent of the original author best, or a BSD licence. Thijs
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part