Re: shc -- #335278 broken packaging -- non-DD NMU prepared

["Nigel Jones" <nigelj@gmail.com>]

> From memory, aren't NMU's (even more so, non-DD NMU's) only meant to
fix RC bugs?  Not new upstream releases?

Just 2 cents

On 7/14/06, George Danchev <danchev@spnet.net> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Yet another attempt to find a sponsor for the shc package. Fixes several
> RC-bugs as described by Frank Lichtenheld in #335278 buglog. Changes read:
>
>  shc (3.8.6-1) unstable; urgency=low
>  .
>    * Non-maintainer upload.
>    * New upstream release.  (Closes: #338451)
>    * Clear out shc.c ARC4 implementation license - done upstream (Closes:
> #335278)
>    * use ${shlibs:Depends}
>    * support for CFLAGS and DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS
>    * remove bogus suggests on bash, since it is essential (Closes: #300626)
>    * use dh_{strip,shlibdeps,gencontrol,md5sum,builddeb}, remove dh_perl
>    * Standards-Version: 3.7.2
>    * Debhelper compat level 4
>    * fix the copyright file
>    * add myself to uploaders
>
> Some of the work history:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=335278
>
> New package:
> dget from ftp://ftp.logos-bg.net/debian-addons-bg/dists/unstable/shc/
>
> --
> pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu>
> fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB


--
N Jones