Re: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath documentation
Charles Fry wrote:
> I finally found some pseudo-official documentation on this:
> which confirms what you said:
> "Currently, the only valid use of this feature in Debian is to add
> non-standard library path (like /usr/lib/<package>) to libraries that
> are only intended to be used by the executables (or other libraries)
> within the package."
Shouldn't those cases be fixed via LD_LIBRARY_PATH?