[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Please help: Amendments for packages-arch-specific



Dear mentors,

I've had no luck so far with getting architectures added for my packages
in
http://cvs.debian.org/srcdep/Packages-arch-specific?cvsroot=dak&rev=HEAD
as kindly suggested by Justin Pryzby here:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2006/04/msg00340.html

I have asked the maintainers of the Packages-arch-specific file twice as
per the messages below with no result and no response thus far.

I am a bit at a loss here as to what to do next. Am I not asking for the
right thing? Could I make the changes myself somehow or is the file
off-limits?

Any help would be greatly appreciated. (Quite a bit of work has gone
into the amd64 version of the packages and it would really be good to
have them available in the repository so that a broader audience can
test them and I can fix bugs before etch freezes.)

Thanks a lot & best regards,
Andree

-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: Andree Leidenfrost <andree@debian.org>
To: lamont@debian.org
Subject: [Fwd: Amendments for packages-arch-specific]
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 22:30:46 +1000
Hi Lamont,

I sent the message below a while ago. I noticed that you changed the
Packages-arch-specific file on 8 May, so I thought I nudge you about it
this time.

It would be really cool if you could do these changes. (If there is
anything else I need to do to get this changed please let me know.)

Cheers,
Andree

-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: Andree Leidenfrost <andree@debian.org>
To: james@nocrew.org
Cc: lamont@debian.org, adconrad@debian.org
Subject: Amendments for packages-arch-specific
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:02:07 +1000
Dear James,

It would be great if you could amend the architecture specific
information of my packages as follows:

mindi: i386 ia64 amd64
mindi-busybox: i386 ia64 amd64
mondo: i386 amd64

Thank you very much and best regards,
Andree

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: