Dear mentors, I've had no luck so far with getting architectures added for my packages in http://cvs.debian.org/srcdep/Packages-arch-specific?cvsroot=dak&rev=HEAD as kindly suggested by Justin Pryzby here: http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2006/04/msg00340.html I have asked the maintainers of the Packages-arch-specific file twice as per the messages below with no result and no response thus far. I am a bit at a loss here as to what to do next. Am I not asking for the right thing? Could I make the changes myself somehow or is the file off-limits? Any help would be greatly appreciated. (Quite a bit of work has gone into the amd64 version of the packages and it would really be good to have them available in the repository so that a broader audience can test them and I can fix bugs before etch freezes.) Thanks a lot & best regards, Andree -------- Forwarded Message -------- From: Andree Leidenfrost <andree@debian.org> To: lamont@debian.org Subject: [Fwd: Amendments for packages-arch-specific] Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 22:30:46 +1000 Hi Lamont, I sent the message below a while ago. I noticed that you changed the Packages-arch-specific file on 8 May, so I thought I nudge you about it this time. It would be really cool if you could do these changes. (If there is anything else I need to do to get this changed please let me know.) Cheers, Andree -------- Forwarded Message -------- From: Andree Leidenfrost <andree@debian.org> To: james@nocrew.org Cc: lamont@debian.org, adconrad@debian.org Subject: Amendments for packages-arch-specific Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:02:07 +1000 Dear James, It would be great if you could amend the architecture specific information of my packages as follows: mindi: i386 ia64 amd64 mindi-busybox: i386 ia64 amd64 mondo: i386 amd64 Thank you very much and best regards, Andree
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part