Re: Naming conventions for mingw32 packages?
Dear Debian Mentors,
The zlib development package in Debian is called:
While I do understand the "1", I don't understand the "g".
In particular, should I adopt that naming convention for
mingw32 cross builds?
Usually, I would name the mingw32 package according to the
DLL file "zlib1.dll", i.e.:
However, probably there is a good reason to call it:
instead. Which of them should I prefer?
Sorry for my questions, but there isn't any "Debian MinGW
Policy" out there, is it?