Re: RFS: sdljump
On 2/13/06, Bas Wijnen <email@example.com> wrote:
> A small problem with it though: When I put all architecture independant data
> in its own package, lintian starts complaining that the binary lacks a
> manpage. For the moment, I moved the manpage back in the arch:any package
> (it's small anyway), but that doesn't seem to be a good solution. Is an
> override in order for this? Or is there a better solution?
I've been told that the manpage usually goes with the binary. Since
it's really small, I guess that it's not much of a problem
I'm currently uploading the package. Hopefully it'll get through NEW soon.