El d�21/09/2005 a 06:17 Bas Wijnen escribio ...
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 03:58:15AM -0500, Rudy Godoy wrote:
> > El d?a 20/09/2005 a 02:41 W. Borgert escribio ...
> >
> > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 01:24:20AM -0500, Rudy Godoy wrote:
> > > > Hi, I've almost finished the port to gtk2 of one of my packages[0], my
> > > > question is regarding to the package versioning since upstream seems
> > > > pretty MIA and I'm unlikely to push it upstream but I'd like to have
> > > > this on Debian. So how should I go add a -gtk2, as I'm doing now, to
> > > > the version number or put this as another package and replace the
> > > > former?
> > >
> > > Is there a need to keep the GTK+ 1 version anyway? I would
> > > throw the old stuff away...
> >
> > No, I missed to tell that the Debian source package[0] has been
> > heavily modified so it differs with upstream's latest release.
> > I was thinking just to have the gtk2 port inside diff.gz as another
> > Debian source hack, probably I'll go that way.
>
> With upstream MIA but need for them anyway (since there is a large diff.gz),
> it may also be an option to fork the code and become upstream yourself.
>
Yes, but I have good news, upstream answered back so we'll have
updates soon.
thanks.
Rudy
--
Rudy Godoy | 0x3433BD21 | http://stone-head.org ,''`.
http://www.apesol.org - http://www.debian.org : :' :
GPG FP: 0D12 8537 607E 2DF5 4EFB 35A7 550F 1A00 3433 BD21 `. `'
`-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature