Re: Removing non-free documentation from a package
* Russ Allbery <email@example.com> [2005-09-15 12:16]:
> Bas Wijnen <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > Doc packages are usually called package-doc. I see no reason to change
> > that here, except that adding non-free seems to make sense. Removing
> > "lib" would just confuse the name, because it would be less clear which
> > package the doc is for.
> I prefer -tutorial to -doc in this particular case, since otherwise when
> browsing the package list I'd think I'd have to install the -doc package
> to get any documentation at all (rather than just a separate tutorial).
This is a sensible suggestion but, since you did not Cc: it to me as I
requested in my first post, it came too late. The package is already
uploaded with the name libparse-recdescent-perl-doc-nonfree. It's too
bad, because I would had 3rd place in the longest-package-name contest in
Debian, only behind libbusiness-onlinepayment-bankofamerica-perl and
Perhaps I can find a way to upload