On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 05:24:47PM -0600, Bruce Sass wrote: > Isn't this simply a case of,`too bad cogito guys, that filename is > already taken.' I suppose other things being equal it'd make sense to give the older package priority. Though git (the new one) seems something that users are particularly likely to build (and distribute) rather complicated scripts on top of, which may make the rename more annoying. --b.