Re: [Pkg-firebird-general] Request for comments for ibwebadmin package

To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [Pkg-firebird-general] Request for comments for ibwebadmin package
From: Remco Seesink <raseesink@hotpop.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 23:52:15 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040608235215.684008e9.raseesink@hotpop.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1086700612.598.29.camel@glue>
References: <[🔎] 20040608011248.6431f785.raseesink@hotpop.com> <[🔎] 1086700612.598.29.camel@glue>

> 2. I don't like the "No Nonsense Copyright and License for JSRS
> JavaScript Remote Scripting".  It seems that debian-legal didn't like
> it either.  Again you should try to contact upstream and explain
> the problem. Dual licensing w/ GPL (or LGPL) would be an option

Aargh. I somehow missed:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/05/msg00824.html

sniff.... OK, i'll contact upstream JSRS. This is serious enough right?

Cheers,
Remco.

Reply to:

References:
- Request for comments for ibwebadmin package
  - From: Remco Seesink <raseesink@hotpop.com>
- Re: [Pkg-firebird-general] Request for comments for ibwebadmin package
  - From: "Grzegorz B. Prokopski" <gadek@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Request for retrying build of libopenhbci-plugin-ddvcard on arm
Next by Date: Re: why are these packages in testing?
Previous by thread: Re: [Pkg-firebird-general] Request for comments for ibwebadmin package
Next by thread: Adoption for python-gd, looking for sponsors
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread