Re: Why Katie thinks it's an NMU?

[Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>]

* Roger Leigh (roger@whinlatter.uklinux.net) [040313 01:10]:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Magosányi Árpád <mag@bunuel.tii.matav.hu> writes:
> 
> > But Katie thinks that my latest two uploads were NMU.
> > The same is the case with zorp.
> >
> > What did I do wrong?

> What was the version number?  The Debian revision number should only
> be one digit, not two (NMU) or three (binary NMU).

The version number has no effect at all whether katie considers
something to be a NMU or not.


Cheers,
Andi
-- 
   http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
   PGP 1024/89FB5CE5  DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F  3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C