Re: take over libghttp
On Fri, Dec 26, 2003 at 10:45:09AM +0100, GCS wrote:
> Is it adviceable to take over libghttp? It seems the only one package
> needs it is libhttp-ghttp-perl and also orphaned. IMHO it would be
> better to remove them: gnome-vfs replaces libghttp and perl has other
> bindings to http usage.
If it were me I'd call for a removal as it's been depreciated upstream
(I used it in one of my personal projects and migrating to libcurl was