Re: take over libghttp
Steve Kemp (firstname.lastname@example.org) wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 26, 2003 at 10:45:09AM +0100, GCS wrote:
> > Is it adviceable to take over libghttp? It seems the only one package
> > needs it is libhttp-ghttp-perl and also orphaned. IMHO it would be
> > better to remove them: gnome-vfs replaces libghttp and perl has other
> > bindings to http usage.
> If it were me I'd call for a removal as it's been depreciated upstream
> (I used it in one of my personal projects and migrating to libcurl was
> very straightforward..)
And libhttp-ghttp-perl is used by axkit which is ITA'ed. So maybe the person
that ITA'ed axkit should also take these two packages.
Ardo van Rangelrooij
home email: email@example.com
home page: http://people.debian.org/~ardo
GnuPG fp: 3B 1F 21 72 00 5C 3A 73 7F 72 DF D9 90 78 47 F9