Re: neglected RC bugs
> The list is short, but I don't consider it to be complete. Several
> cases which aren't covered, such as when someone other than the
> maintainer confirms the bug or provides more info, or where there has
> been a dialog between the maintainer and reporter with the ball left in
> the maintainer's hands.
Perhaps the tool that generates the list could be amended to list "someone
other than maintainer has responded, but maintainer has not" cases. Is
this likely to generate a lot of false positives?