Re: preferred method for coexistence of debconf- and manual parts in conf[ig ]files?
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 06:36:14PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> Steve Langasek <email@example.com> schrieb:
> > I would say that, even though this is a cop-out, it's a better solution
> > than what's in place for tetex today.
> Hm, so this is in contrast to what Colin and Andreas said, as far as we
> think about a quick-and-dirty solution. Comments?
I never said that it was not better than the current solution, just
that other solutions are IMHO are better. :-P