Re: GNAT 3.15p
Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> writes:
> Ludovic Brenta <ludovic.brenta@insalien.org> writes:
>
> > So, here you go: http://users.skynet.be/ludovic.brenta
>
> Thanks a lot. Here are a few comments:
>
> Your shared library support is probably incompatible with ACT's. Do
> you really want to enable it by default?
Well, yes, I would like to, especially since gnat 3.14p did, too.
Could you shed some light on what makes "my" shared library support
incompatible with ACT's? I didn't change the sonames.
> You should bump Standards-Version to the most recent one (after
> checking that no changes are necessay).
OK, will do. I was wondering where I could find a diff between
various Standards-Versions to check for any changes I need to make.
Any ideas?
> The gnat package should also conflict with gnat-3.2, not just with
> gnat-3.3.
Good suggestion.
> The build dependency on autoconf 2.57 is wrong. GCC still needs
> autoconf 2.13. You should avoid rerunning autoheader.
OK.
> You should drop the line "GNAT is actively maintained by Ada Core
> Technology (http://www.gnat.com/)." from the package description.
> It's simply not true from Debian's point of view.
OK. This was the previous maintainer's description, I'll just change
that.
> Your package suggests asis etc., but these are currently not packaged
> for 3.15p.
I'm planning to do this once I become a DD. These packages just need
upgrading from 3.14p.
> Otherwise, your gnat package appears to be fine.
Thanks for your constructive criticism.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
Reply to: