[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Looking for a sponsor for translate-docformat



> > I'm looking for a sponsor for the package translate-docformat which is
> > orphaned.
> >
> > Description: any-to-any document translation system
> >
> > This is a command-line front end to many document format translation
> > programs to facilitate the translation of documents from
> > one format to another.
> >
> > Currently it supports major formats like the docbook, linuxdoc, debiandoc,
> > and TeX, translating to HTML and ps and text.
> >
> > If you are interested you can take a look at:
> > http://studwww.ugent.be/~lukclaes/debian/
> >
> Hi, I've had a look at this.  It's generally okay and I will be happy to
> sponsor it for you.
>
> There are just two points I'd like to clear up first:
>
>     1: Why is it a Debian native package?  I know that it already *was* a
>        Debian native package before it was orphaned, but should it still be?
>        I personally don't see any reason not to split it to diff.gz and
>        orig.tar.gz (except *possibly* that it's such a small package anyway,
>        but that's not a good enough reason to keep it Debian native IMO). If
>        you can come up with a decent rationale for this, then it really
>        doesn't matter, but I'd like to hear the rationale.  I know it has
>        fairly debian specific uses (debiandoc-sgml) but should it really be
>        a Debian-only package?

Take a look at http://studwww.ugent.be/~lukclaes/debian. Any comments on
the split are welcome because I do not know if it is all right.

>     2:
> N: Processing source package translate-docformat (version 0.5) ...
> W: translate-docformat source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.5.6
> N:
> N:   The source package refers to a 'Standards-Version' that is starting to
> N:   get out of date, compared to current Policy. You can safely ignore
> N:   this warning, but please consider updating the package to current
> N:   Policy.
>
> We're up to version 3.5.10 of policy now as I recall.  You should think
> about going through and making sure the whole package adheres to latest
> policy and bump the standards version.
> This isn't a bar to me uploading it, but it's something you should be aware
> of.

I know. I will handle it soon. It is my first package and I like to have a
sponsored upload first.

Kind regards

Luk



Reply to: