Re: Use of the BTS for managing sponsorship
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 04:43:18PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Jérôme Marant
> | On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 03:21:11PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> | > Then I suggest you scratch your itch without forcing everybody else to
> | > have the same itch as you.
> | I want something that you don't need. Then, I win.
> | 'Tell me what you need and I'll tell you how not to need it'
> | That's what you are proposing.
> No, it's not. I am saying that I don't think this is a problem. You
> are proposing to change how I do my stuff, not the other way around.
> | > | I have a recent case of someone who NMU'ed packages of someone
> | > | I do sponsor but I wasn't aware of that.
> | >
> | > Then you hadn't subscribed to the package through the PTS, I think.
> | Of course I did, but NMU requests have never been implied
> | access to the BTS. I want an entry point for contacts with the
> | sponsoree. I don't have any currently.
> Parse error for the first part.
> Uhm, you don't have an entry point? Like -mentors?
> | It is a matter of practice. The one Raphaël is proposing would not
> | be annoying at all.
> For me it would, because of the amount of noise. The BTS is quite
And -mentors is not ?