gphoto2 (WAS: RE: including full source code in upload)
> > Incidentally, why is the source package called 'gphoto2'? I see that
> > there is still a 'gphoto' package in Debian; is that not superseded by
> > gphoto 2.0? Are there reasons that someone would need both gphoto and
> > gphoto2 installed on their system, or why some people need one and
> > others need the other?
> No gphoto and gphoto2 are really different and both should be available.
> gphoto is a all-in-one package to provide gui access to a digital
> gphoto2 is a library which is used by frontend (gui). A command-line
> frontend is included in the package but others are available.
Then why not libgphoto2? Or something making it more obvious it's a lib?s