Re: Include bison-generated files in package?
Brett Cundal <email@example.com> cum veritate scripsit:
> So, what's wrong with this picture? Should I build-depend on bison and
> generate the file in the build target, or should I modify the makefile
> to not delete the generated file? Both seem ugly to me. Is there
> something else I should do?
I'd recommend build depending on bison, and building it.
Having intermediate files included in the distribution is rather wrong,
and I think the preferred source format for editing is the bison
source, not the bison-generated source.
firstname.lastname@example.org : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4