choosing a package name

[Corrin Lakeland <lakeland@freki.otago.ac.nz>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I'm packaging gnubg (gnu backgammon program).  I'm a bit worried that this 
name is too short and I should call it gnubackgammon or something.

I asked upstream and they said:

> Personally I have a slight preference for gnubg for consistency, but I
> don't particularly mind if you call it something else.

I don't really mind, I just want to upset and confuse the minimum number of 
people.

Corrin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6pX259o3gUBuxj/sRAqaRAKCTO0bEofBVSuBP1ibVX/oA4/PN0QCdGrU5
PJvnM9Juy4ftv3GoUWZ45Hw=
=bztp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----