Re: Policy question about web application
On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 01:06:20AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> Argh. Please send that information to email@example.com, to help increase
I will, and for mine (104151) to :-)
> Make sure you investigate web server support and affected packages first. The
> more information you provide, the better informed people will be about the
I've already do it to increase chance to have an answer before policy freeze.
I'm looking for second (104146).
But my first question is : Is it allowed or not ?
> > This change may create some bugs against http server while currently all
> > package directly that install cgi under /usr/lib/cgi-lib work without
> > change the server configuration, I'm not sure this be easy to for
> > subdirectory.
> I know that boa at least does not support this (#90601), but Apache certainly
> does, and I'm pretty sure that Roxen does as well.
I haven't to much time to look at this closer :-(
I think that we should have more than one httpd virtual kind.
There is some without cgi capability, and some with. And you point to me
there is other sub-category.