On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 01:21:38PM -0500, Joe Drew wrote: > On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 11:20:11AM -0500, Christopher Allen wrote: > This means that when a package produces one binary which can optionally > have X support (like gnuplot), it should have it. In your case (and mine, > lxdoom), separate binaries are produced with differing support; the svgalib > binary is useless to an m68k user, for example, so have separate packages, > and make the svgalib package Architecture: i386 only (since that's the > same as svgalibg1). I'm making a package, called prozilla, it may be compiled with and without Gtk support, (Gtk means X here right?), both compilations produces the same binary file 'proz', I would like to make 2 packages for it, one with gtk (prozilla-gtk) and one without it (prozilla), cause I don't think it is right to have a downloader wich can be runned in console depending on libgtk1.2 if you don't want to use gtk... what is the right thing? I think here of a person who doesn't use X, in a 486, for example, but wants to use prozilla, It is not a good think for he/she to install libgtk1.2 just for this right? []s! -- Gustavo Noronha Silva - kov /******************************************************* .''`. * http://www.metainfo.org/kov * : :' : * GPG Key: http://www.metainfo.org/kov/html/pgp.html * `. `'` * http://www.brainbench.com/transcript.jsp?pid=2448987 * `- *******************************************************/ Debian
Attachment:
pgpU5uepuhtb4.pgp
Description: PGP signature