On Sun, 10 Dec 2000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 11:49:49AM -0200, Henrique M Holschuh wrote:
> > I didn't receive warnings from any tools (otherwise it wouldn't have taken
> > months for me to notice the problem).
> Oh? I notice that dpkg-source complains about when building the
> .diff.gz; it says something like "warning: upstream source does not
> unpack into packagename-version."
I tried it again, and for foo-1.2.3 it outputs no warnings. If I use foo
only (or something even weirder), then the warning shows up.
So dpkg-source officially acknowleges foo-1.2.3 and foo-1.2.3.orig as good
.orig.tar.gz unpack destinations.
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot