Re: Why this?
On Monday 27 November 2000 19:39, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > Hi
> I wonder about this error:
> N: Processing binary package libmcal0 (version 0.6-3) ...
> E: libmcal0: ldconfig-symlink-missing-for-shlib usr/lib/libmcal.so.0.6
> libmcal N:
> N: The package should not only include the shared library itself, but
> N: also the symbolic link which ldconfig would produce. (This is
> N: necessary, so that the link gets removed by dpkg automatically when
> N: the package gets removed.)
> N: Refer to Policy Manual, section 4.3 for details.
> N: Processing binary package libmcal-dev (version 0.6-3) ...
> Why does this occur? And what should I do about it?
I think libmcal0 package should have a symlink libmcal.so.0->libmcal.so.0.6.
Mariusz Przygodzki | Good judgement comes from experience.
firstname.lastname@example.org | Experience comes from bad judgement.
GPG KeyID: 0x42FAD771
GPG Fingerprint: 1990 F07B FFB4 BE0B FF26 10C2 BE2B 965C 42FA D771
- Why this?
- From: Ola Lundqvist <email@example.com>