Re: eggdrop .so plugins
On Wed, Oct 25, 2000, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > E: eggdrop: shlib-with-non-pic-code usr/lib/eggdrop/modules/channels.so
> > so, do i ignore the message, or do i hack Makefile.in to add -fPIC on
> > those .so files?
> The latter, I think. Since they aren't really shared libraries you can
> ignore the other Lintian errors, but this one is different.
Does anyone remember what the rationale is for having to use -fPIC
for plugins ? It's not explained in the Policy, so I suppose it's for
performance issues (not having to do symbol resolution at each call if I
understand the issue well).
But sometimes this is just not possible at all (-fPIC eats a whole
register and some assembly routines may use all of them), and there are
situations where not using -fPIC is a performance loss.
I sincerely think something has to be changed in the Policy here.
Samuel Hocevar <email@example.com> http://sam.zoy.org/
for DVDs in Linux screw the MPAA and ; do dig $DVDs.z.zoy.org ; done | \
perl -ne 's/\.//g; print pack("H224",$1) if(/^x([^z]*)/)' | gunzip