Re: Bug#67896: Support patch for dh_builddeps
On Sun, Jul 30, 2000 at 10:42:41PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Christian Hammers wrote:
> > Well, I never received a mail froma an autobuilder saying that one of
> > my packages (about 10) were examined and found to have the following
> > buildtime dependencies.
>
> Probably because it's a recent change.
>
> > Maybe this should be done so that they can be included (as required by
> > policy, or not?) into the control file by the maintainers.
>
> Just upload something and wait until the m68k autobuilder hits it..
I think Roman reports those things as bugs, so maybe you're just a good
maintainer?
See here for some of the source-dependencies the autobuilders use:
http://buildd.debian.org/andrea/m68k/source-dependencies-unstable.gz
And maybe here for an older text I have written when Build-Depends came up
(this may be seriously out of date, I let the daemons do the bug reporting now)
http://www.debian.org/~cts/Build-Depends
I did not follow the discussion completely, but I think its rather
pointless, since its all already there in sbuild and the build-daemons.
If you look at some of the bugs Roman has reported for the m68k-buildd
http://master.debian.org/~cpbs/subs/r/romanhodekinformatikunierlangende.html
(Missing build dependencies) you should see this. I do not want to pick a
package from that list now, beside, uk.debian seems not to work ATM...
Christian
Reply to: