Re: gnupg signing

[Stefan Alfredsson <stefan@alfredsson.org>]

This might be somewhat inconvenient, but how about including MD5 sums
of the attachments in the body of the message, which is then signed?
(i.e. md5sums *.jpg  + cutnpaste)

But since you will do a lot of signing in the future, I'd suggest
using a mailer that handles gpg, as the others have suggested :)

Quoting Britton <fsblk@aurora.uaf.edu>:
> 
> see any gpg options to mh, and if I include my scanned identification as
> an attachment, then it will not count as input to the hash of the message.  

Regards,
 Stefan