Re: gnupg signing
On Fri, 28 Jul 2000 11:15:13 +0000
Christoph Baumann <cgb@debian.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 10:23:25AM -0800, Britton wrote:
>> I now have my key, scannec copy of id, etc. all in hand, and am
>> ready to post to new-maintainer, but I am not sure how to sign my
>> message. I don't see any gpg options to mh, and if I include my
>> scanned identification as
> You should have a look at mutt. It handles gpg signing etc.
Why bother? Mutt is so terribly inflexible compared to MH.
I'd recommend:
1) get nmh instead of RAND MH.
2) use either exmh (which has PGP/GPG support) or one of the Emacs
MH-based modes which has PGP/GPG support (I use exmh so I'd have
which).
--
J C Lawrence Home: claw@kanga.nu
---------(*) Other: coder@kanga.nu
http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Keys etc: finger claw@kanga.nu
--=| A man is as sane as he is dangerous to his environment |=--
Reply to: