Re: question about version number
"Martin Bialasinski" <martin@internet-treff.uni-koeln.de> writes:
> Because 1.6 < 1.52, as 6 < 52
>
> He did the right thing.
Sure he did, but what I meant is how could he know the next version
would be (imho wrongly) be versioned 1.6? Normally, the version
following 1.52 would be 1.53.
Maybe he knew because the upstream source told him how to interpret
that special versioning, so everything is fine...;)
Stephan
--
s-Stephan Suerken <suerken@fh-worms.de>
s-Voice (+49) (6241) 92566-2 -- WWW http://www.fh-worms.de/~suerken
s-Debian-related mail: <absurd@debian.org>
Reply to: