Re: RFC: regarding /etc/shells
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Thu, 7 May 1998, Shaleh wrote:
> /etc/shells is not yours to mess w/. You are right there. Perhaps a
> update-shells or something?
This would be great for slink. Maybe for hamm is too late. I don't know.
My /etc/shells contains many shells I have never installed, but not tcsh.
So it seems there is an "implicit" policy of including all possible shells
in /etc/shells. If we agree in keeping this policy for hamm, then perhaps
the best thing to do would be to ask Guy Maor (passwd maintainer) to add
tcsh to /etc/shells.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com