Re: dicomscope documentation
> Le Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:47:42PM +0100, Michael Hanke a écrit :
> > Please pardon my ignorance, but is a PDF itself not considered
> > problematic since it is most likely not the 'source'?
> > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 08:10:25PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Instead of repacking a corrected tarball for Debian, I recommend to suggest
> Upstream to publish a tarball version 184.108.40.206 (or whichever), with the updated
Sorry, I completely misunderstood the original question.
We have to ask Upstream to upload with the PDF source of course :)
Have a nice day,