Re: Patch format
Le Mon, May 19, 2008 at 12:27:14PM +0200, Daniel Leidert a écrit :
> Am Montag, den 19.05.2008, 13:22 +0900 schrieb Charles Plessy:
> >
> > I do not understand: the link you gave is for changelogs.
>
> Yeah, exactly. And a Changelog entry is nothing else than a change
> description ... exactly what you try to achieve - describe, what apatch
> does/changes. As I told in this thread I would recommend a good patch
> description in debian/changelog (a changelog), because it is the first
> place one will look for. And you can use the same patch/change
> description you put in the changelog also in the patch. It makes it easy
> to understand, where something has changed and why.
In the end, why not, but I would prefer to settle on the format that
will emerge from the discussion on -devel (and the one I proposed is
very similar for the moment). So maybe you can make your suggestion
there?
Have a nice day,
--
Charles
Reply to: