Re: Debtags for medical issues

[Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de>]

On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
[Karsten, please keep  debtags-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org  in CC.]

> On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 01:23:51PM +0200, Christian Heller wrote:
>
> > medicine::pms
> > medicine::his
> > medicine::doc::requirements
> > medicine::doc::standards::openehr (part of CEN/TC251)
> > medicine::doc::standards::hl7
> > medicine::doc::standards::hdtf
> > medicine::doc::standards::edifact
> > medicine::doc::standards::xdt (future standard in Germany is SCIPHOX)
> > medicine::doc::standards::hxp
> > medicine::doc::standards::dicom
>
> What's the point of tagging
>
> hl7-rimX-1.4.deb
>
> as "medicine::doc::standards::hl7" ?
>
> IOW why not tag the standards' docs packages
> "medicine::doc::standards" and leave it at that ? I would
> even argue to make do with "medicine::doc".
>
> medicine
> -> applied
>    -> pms
> 	-> his
> 	-> ris
> -> research
>    -> ...
> -> docs
>    -> ...
> -> common
>    -> ...
> 	?
I like the last one for DebTags.
On the other hand it is not really applicable for meta packages and thus I
have to rethink my last mail that I want to take over the DebTags scheme.

Thanks for your input

        Andreas.

--
http://fam-tille.de