Re: RFC: persistence improvements plans
Sorry for the delay, I cannot read all I wish in time unfortunately :).
My only question is about this:
“The Tails usecase requires to move most boot-time communication with
the user to a graphical boot menu, running long after live-boot has
finished its job.”
What is the graphical boot menu you're talking about? A selection of
persistence type for users? I suppose this menu will be optional. I'm
sorry I've never booted Tails, maybe this gives the answer.
Note that, what we're missing in DoudouLinux, is a persistence
notification icon on the desktop panel. This would be used to show the
fact that user's data are saved or not (which is quite important!), and
to start a persistence setting tool. Maybe it is possible to share the
effort of programming such software in the future, anyone interested?
Le jeudi 03 novembre 2011 à 02:13 +0100, intrigeri a écrit :
> I have published, eventually, in the form of a RFC on the Debian Live
> website, the plans we came up with Daniel last summer about
> improvements to the Debian Live persistence support that are needed to
> support the Tails (https://tails.boum.org/) usecases.
> I'd like to get feedback on this plan, especially from list members
> who use persistence features, either for themselves or in the context
> of deployments of Debian Live systems they know well.
> Some user interface (read: parameter names and semantics) mangling is
> part of our scheme, so you'd better make sure *now* we did not plan to
> break the particular combination of options you use, incidentally.
> Here is the RFC:
> intrigeri <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
> | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
> | So what?