Re: The Status page of Debian-Live is cryptic
2011/5/30 Ben Armstrong <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> On 30/05/11 04:53 PM, shirish शिरीष wrote:
>> It is cryptic both for uninformed casual user as well as a casual
>> debian user, except for the hardened/enthusiast debian-user wouldn't
>> know how to make sense of it.
> I'm confused why you skipped our documentation and other parts of the
> site, and just went straight for the Status page, a page with almost
> nothing on it, to learn everything about the project and how to use the
> software we make. That's just ... well, rather baffling. This page is
> only meant to keep developers of live systems using our tools up to date
> with what we're working on as a project, nothing more.
First of all thank you for taking time and being prompt for your reply.
Well, the issue is while I did go first to the releases site and while
I did see the rescue .torrent as well as rescue.iso I was not able to
figure out if it was a GUI-based rescue CD/DVD or not. In my back of
my mind I am thinking the Ubuntu Live/Install/Rescue CD all rolled
Could you or anybody else direct me to a link which explains all the
different options listed on this page ?
As far as the Status page, if its for developers/testers/advanced
users who may be helping with the project, then something to that
affect should be on that page.
I actually looked first at the NEWS page and then the Status page. The
link I missed was the live-manual but then that's 60+ pages of
documentation which I cannot look at one go.
>> While I cannot imagine all the user
>> stories or test-cases couple of the most common ones come to mind :-
>> a. I want to use a live-CD to check out Debian, which one should I use ?
> And you would use "Status" for that, and not "Releases"? If you want to
> use a live CD to check out Debian, I think the obvious answer is "use
> the latest release".
Which comes back to my previous point. Nothing to tell me what all and
any of the options do .
Even going to each of the sub-directories does not add anything useful to me.
A webpage with info. which tells me the difference say between bt-hdd
releases and bt-hybrid and if in bt-hybrid the difference between
GNOME and rescue iso's. Luckily I know that the others are all
different Window Managers but still do not know about the rescue ISO.
Also at a glance, I do not know what the eventual size of each CD or
DVD would be and on why they are the way they are.
For instance when I looked at
I saw almost each CD and DVD size are different.
For instance, http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/release/current-live/amd64/iso-hybrid/debian-live-6.0.1-amd64-gnome-desktop.iso
is 1.1 G
while the rescue .iso
is 544MB which means something is missing
which means that there are somethings which are not in rescue, is that
just a CLI-based rescue CD ?
What would have been better is to per-use perhaps something like
http://www.debian.org/CD/ and http://www.debian.org/CD/torrent-cd/
Atleast before committing time I know what is there or not or atleast
some assumptions can be made. As of now, sadly it seems half-finished.
If I download the GNOME.iso then almost 3+GB space would be wasted as
there would be nothing else I could put in as its an ISO.
Some more clarity would be good here.
>> b. I want to use the Live-CD as a rescue CD, which one should I go for ?
> Again, "Status" for this? The download area indicates there's a rescue
> flavor. That would be an obvious choice.
>> Now, apparently or shallowy , it seems the answers to both the
>> questions may be/might be live-build2.x . If my assumption is correct,
>> then why isn't it given as a recommendation for a new user .
> Since live-build 2.x is what's in Debian Stable, that is implicitly
> recommended, since Testing/Unstable are not for casual end-users, but
> only for "hardened/enthusiast" users, as you characterize them.
Then shouldn't there be a (recommended) kinda link given therein.
This would make it easy for newbies to know what they have to do.
>> Lastly, the workaround given as the link
>> http://lists.debian.org/debian-live/2011/05/msg00144.html should
>> either have preceeded or have instructions before, during or after
>> downloading the live-build how to add that repo. because without a
>> functioning stable kernel (with aufs) things cannot go far.
> If you using Testing or Unstable, you should be aware that not
> everything works all of the time. People doing this *are* hardcore
> users, and should therefore not be confused when they read terse status
> updates linking to bug#s.
Something more interesting, I was looking at the image builders and
there were two options given, a cgi-bin based service and another
django based service . Atleast for the django webservice it asks for a
key and does not tell what kind of key is needed there.
Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल
My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17